World Trade Centre Buildings Hit by Anti Gravity Balls

[chemtrails]

This would appear to be the most plausible theory to date

http://www.richplanet.net/911.php

[GodSaveTheTeam]

This has already been posted somewhere. Cant find the thread at the mo.

Sorry. I dont buy it.

For me the chances of a UFO type object hurtling above the streets of NYC and not being mentioned once anywhere by anyone in any testimony at all edges it beyond credibility for me I'm afraid.

Also, the video claims that only a small percentage of people reported hearing and seeing a plane. This is put forward as proof of "no plane".

But in the same video it is postulated that the reason people didn't see "the ball" is because there were lots of tall buildings around and the line of sight would have made it difficult for people to see "the ball".

Well, doesn't the same apply when viewing the plane?

The reason people didn't see "the ball" could be the same reason people didn't see the plane. Do you understand. Or innerstand?

Also, this video does a great job at debunking september clues. The graphic showing the line of flight of "the ball" proves that the flight path looks different from different perspectives.

Nice.

[Daniel Elliott]

I think the video is probably more credible than most of the posts that go on here. Why is it not in the 9/11 Truth News Section?
It’s hard for many including myself to detach from the distractions surrounding the event and focus on evidence to draw conclusions. No doubt this will rumble on with members of this forum (genuine or those on department payroll) hacking away at each other.

Well done, Mr Chemtrails.

[item8]

Don't we have a place to put this kind of balls?

[fish5133]

[Daniel Elliott]

That made me laugh, Fish. Nice one.