A Cure for Cancer - as not given by pharmecutical industry

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

You should all watch this documentary in it's entirety

If you have any doubts about the validity of the above statement then watching this will change your mind

I know some of you have a short attention span so bear with it

Cancer is a vitamin deficiency (FACT)

A World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B 17
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=4312930190281243507

[telecasterisation]

[Patrick Brown]

What's this got to do with 911?

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

Watch the video

what I have concluded from the video is that by changing your diet to include foods with Vitamin B17 in them your chances of getting cancer are virtually nil.

It's the same scenario as scurvy - you take Vitamin C and you don't get scurvy

You take Vitamin B17 - you don't get cancer

This information is suppressed by mainstream media

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

[andyb]

TTWSU3,

Not like you to go completely off topic Have you actually done any of your own research on this or have you simply watched this documentary and made your mind up? I suggest you research things properly before stating them as fact.

Also, how did the bullhorning go?

[Ally]

look what's emerged from their markthomas troll hole, ignore this slimeball Truth.

[telecasterisation]

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

[andyb]

[zappasearcher]

this may be of some interest to you Truth and anyone else who found the cancer doc interesting.

Deconstructing the Myth of AIDS (Gary Null)
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=3983706668483511310&q=aids+m yth

The science baffles me to be honest but I find this whole subject compelling, believable, and not suprising in the least. Time will tell.

[flamesong]

I watched the video - I have had it on my to watch list for several months.

I have a great deal of time for G. Edward Griffin, he deals with issues in a very straight way and does not get overexcited - which allows the viewer to digest the information rather than have it force fed like a foie gras goose.

Whilst the science looks credible, the same logic about diet has been used to make the same claims about fish and molasses. I don't dispute that any of these foods might have benificial anti-carcinogenic effects but I suspect that it has as much to do with what we do to and add to our food as it has to do with what we don't eat. I actually read exactly the same story about the guy with colon cancer (in the video) but in praise of molasses about 20 years ago. There could be some viral mutation here!

As I mentioned in a private message, TTWSY3, I have a very good friend who has a health food shop. I'll be asking him about this and DMSO when I see him on Monday.

[Woodee]

what help would it do me to swallow a WWII bomber to keep me healthy?

In what foods do you find B17 vitamins anyhow? (except in B17 pills obviously)

[TimmyG]

i've done a bit of research on b-17 and i'm pretty convinced. doctors and scientists have been trying to get more funding into b17 research and awareness and have largely been blocked by pharmacutical companies. its been going on since the 50s

eskimos DON'T GET CANCER! because their diet is rich in b17.

i probably need to do a bit more research, but from what i've read so far, it seems like a pretty big thing

apricot seeds are the most b-17 rich food from what i've read. but its in a lot of other fruits too

[flamesong]

[doctorjaclblack]

Well done for bringing this up. I have spent over 3 plus months researching this topic now and have changed my food as a result. I have also spoken with other people who also believe this to be of true value.

Cancer is a vitamin deficiency, vitamin B17. In fact Nitrolosides to be the case. I have a fruit smoothie for breakfast everyday. Much better for me than cereal and milk (of which may I remind people we are the only species on the planet which drinks milk for another animal.) I use kiwi fruit (vit.C), pineapple (asthma), mangoes or papayas and berries. Then I add in approx. 10 apricot kernels and 2-3 spoonfuls of linseed. Linseed is another good source. Then to finish I add in some freshly squeezed orange juice (not concentrate made from sugar), and blend using a hand blender. The result is an amazing drink which makes me feel refreshed and fill me with plenty of vitamins which my body needs.

Dr Lorraine Day has much work on this topic too. Google her, she also has a video out made a while ago, but addresses these issues.

Do we really think the western diet is healthy for us???

Come on people think when you walk down a supermarket isle. Get educated about food, what the numbers actually mean and what the huge number of chemicals used in food can do to you.

Aspartame used in Diet Coke is another. My father in law had a heart attack two months ago and is now better. He's been drinking Diet Coke for 10+years everyday. He had many symptoms such as numbness down the side of the body, in the arms, could never work it out what it was. I've recently sent him a DVD on the dangers of Aspartame and he was in shock. Look in to the history and you'll find our old friend Donald Rusmfeld way back in the 70's, he was the one who pushed it through in to use in the open market despite the fact it failed god knows how many tests in the research phase. Bottom line, is a poison.

Going back to Vitamin B-17. Berries are another excellent source. One of the reasons eskimoes don't get cancer is there diet. They eat meat during summer months and berries through the winter.

Also worth mentioning when you cook food the best way to eat is is as raw as you can. Avoid boiling vegetables as you get rid of all there goodness. Steam if you have too and lightly. Green beans and Brocolli are really nice for dinner one night lightly steamed with a fresh steak. The following day you'll feel full of energy!

Last point, what has this got to with 9-11? You'll find this, 9-11, UFO technology, martial law, etc. are all pieces in a jigsaw puzzle. Look in to 9-11 and you've found a piece. Then start looking in to ajoining pieces and stand back. Once your in this position you'll see the bigger picture to what is really going on.

Remember, the first thing you have to do is OPEN YOUR MIND.

[Dogsmilk]

Well, it'd be handy if I didn't have to quit cigs...

[paul wright]

[flamesong]

Giving up smoking is a revolutionary act!

[paul wright]

[flamesong]

Well, I actually stopped completely just over a year ago - though I had steadily cut down to about two roll-ups per day - but my motivation was given an enormous boost when I realised just how I was propping up the very powers I oppose. I could say the same about alcohol, drugs, debt, television and numerous other mechanisms which have a corrosive effect upon us.

But I opposed smoking even when I smoked. When I was on the Greenpeace ship, Sirius in 1989, there was a vote amongst the crew whether to allow smoking in the mess room. Of the 25 crew the vote was 12 for and 12 against (12 smokers vs 12 non-smokers) I had the casting vote and voted agains As a smoker I incurred the wrath of all the rest of the ship's smokers.

And yes, I'm sure there is a bit of Bill Hicks in you, Paul, which wants to tell me that non-smokers die every day etc.

[paul wright]

Yes Alf we know how good the enslavement to the tobacco industry is, just as enslavement to other corporate holdings
Freedom from the need to smoke is like a freedom from many other things, like the freedom to disbelieve what you're told, even over smoking
I absolutely agree that if people don't need to linger leper-like outside public buildings they are in a way free from the legislation that it must be so
This continues until the behaviour is such that the government construes the aspects of your behaviour are ok within the constraints of known scientific findings
Is this ok?

[L8O1S5T]

Virtually ALL disease is curable naturally but its another thing they are trying to suppress because we all know you can't make money off healthy people...

[ian neal]

Sorry good people

Interesting topic but too far 'off topic'

[malcks]

Cancer doctor sparks chemical alert after being found dead in his car

Apr 24 2009 James Moncur

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/2009/04/24/cancer-doct or-sparks-chemical-alert-after-being-found-dead-in-his-car-86908-21303 183/

A LEADING scientist's death sparked a major chemical alert, with six people needing hospital treatment.

Cancer expert Dr Thomas Friedberg was found dead by his wife Veronica in his car outside their home on Wednesday evening.

A container of an unidentified chemical was also in the car.

Three police officers and two paramedics who tried unsuccessfully to save the 59-year-old pharmacist were exposed to the chemical and were taken to hospital, along with Mrs Friedberg.

A cordon was immediately put in place around the car, while fire crews wearing specialist hazard suits made the area safe.

The scene was sealed off throughout yesterday as the search continued for chemicals in Dr Friedberg's house and the surrounding area of Blairgowrie, Perthshire.

A police spokeswoman confirmed that the six people were taken to hospital as a precaution while the substance was tested.

She added: "There are no apparent suspicious circumstances surrounding the death of Dr Friedberg.

"As in all sudden deaths, a report will be sent to the procurator fiscal in due course."

Dr Friedberg, a father of three grown-up children, was a well respected pharmacist who worked at Dundee University and the city's Ninewells Hospital.

He devoted his time to finding a cure for cancer and led the team that recently identified a major gene that fights the disease.

Dr Friedberg discovered that a subtle change in a particular gene results in the protein it produces being broken down three times faster, reducing the likelihood of developing cancer.

Last night, university colleagues paid a glowing tribute to the scientist.

Professor Martin Pippard, dean of the school of medicine at Dundee University, said: "We are deeply saddened by news of Dr Thomas Friedberg's death.

"Dr Friedberg was an eminent scientist in his field who had made many important contributions in the field of cancer research, particularly in drug development and toxicology.

"He was a much respected and loved colleague of many in the school of medicine and across the university. Our thoughts at this time are with his family."

Professor Roland Wolf, director of the biomedical research institute, added: "Thomas was a warm, kind and much loved member of the institute. He made an exceptional contribution to the research programme of the institute and will be greatly missed."

[TonyGosling]

Conflicts of interest common in cancer research

Last Updated: 2009-07-01 14:07:08 -0400 (Reuters Health)
http://www.curetoday.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/news.showNewsArticle/id/ 13/news_id/1380

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - A "substantial minority" of cancer treatment studies published in major medical journals involve conflicts of interest, according to a new report in the journal Cancer.

And clinical trials with conflicts of interest were more likely to report positive survival outcomes than studies with no industry ties, lead investigator Dr. Reshma Jagsi of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor and colleagues found.

Industry involvement today goes beyond drug companies simply paying for studies of their products, the researchers note; some investigators "receive consulting fees, own stock, and hold leadership positions within organizations that profit from selling the very drugs and devices that are the subject of the researchers' investigations." And many studies, they add, have shown that this kind of involvement can bias findings in industry's favor.

Jagsi and colleagues reviewed funding sources for 1534 oncology studies published in eight journals in 2006 to investigate conflicts of interest in cancer research in more detail. They defined conflict of interest as industry funding, any conflict of interest declared by the authors, or any study authors who took a job in industry when the research was done.

Twenty-nine percent of the papers had some type of conflict of interest, the researchers found, with 17 percent reporting industry funding and 12 percent having authors who were industry employees.

Such conflicts were most common in studies in which the corresponding author worked in medical oncology; 45 percent of the studies meeting this description had conflicts.

By region, conflicts of interest were seen in 33 percent of studies from North America, 27 percent of studies from Europe, 5 percent of studies done in Asia and 40 percent of studies done elsewhere.

Studies led by women were significantly less likely to receive industry funding or to have other conflicts of interest than studies led by men, the researchers found.

While 62 percent of the industry-funded studies had a "major focus" on treatment with the goal of a cure, 36 percent of non-industry-funded studies did.

The researchers also found, "most disturbingly," that industry-funded randomized trials were more likely to have positive outcomes than those that didn't receive industry funding.

They conclude: "In light of these findings, attempts to disentangle the cancer-research effort from industry ties merit further attention, and medical journals should be supported in embracing both rigorous standards of disclosure and heightened scrutiny when conflicts exist."

SOURCE: Cancer, June 15, 2009.

[Thermate911]

Like all good initiatives, cancer 'research' has become a mere money-making machine for the Mengelian Big Pharma.

Amygdalin, (so-called 'vitamin' B17), & Vit C clear most cancers, effectively, no side-effects, permanent. I speak from firsthand experience.

http://www.worldwithoutcancer.com/ presently shows the classic 'Alice Through the Looking Glass' US FDA response, basically summed up as 'apricot seeds are un-approved drugs'.

Can one say 'F*cked Up World' here?

[TonyGosling]

http://www.cancertutor.com/alkaline/

http://www.newswithviews.com/Howenstine/james14.htm

http://www.essense-of-life.com/moreinfo/minerals/M-030/Cesium+Chloride .htm

The History of Cesium Used in Cancer Treatments
The theory behind the cesium treatment for cancer is largely the result of Dr. A. Keith Brewer, PhD. However, it should be noted that during his time a powdered form of cesium was being used, not a liquid ionic form.
The cesium used back then (probably cesium carbonate) was not as powerful, gram for gram, as today’s more potent liquid ionic cesium chloride. Thus, do not use any treatment doses which were designed for powdered cesium. use the doses given by your vendor who has a great deal of experience setting doses. This is especially true if inflammation or swelling is a potential problem.
The key issue is how big the clusters of cesium atoms are. If the cluster is too big, as it frequently is with the powdered versions, virtually none of the cesium gets inside the cancer cells. Cesium simply doesn’t work unless it does get inside the cancer cells.
Cesium has been proven to get into cancer cells, when other nutrients cannot. The cesium:

1) Makes the cancer cells alkaline (Note: the BLOOD is NOT made alkaline, only the inside of the cancer cells),
2) Limits the intake of glucose into the cell (thus starving the cell and making the cell “sick” from lack of food),
3) Neutralizes the lactic acid (which is actually what causes the cell to multiply uncontrollably), and
4) Stops the fermentation process, which is a second affect of limiting the glucose.

A practitioner of cesium chloride was Hans A. Nieper, M.D., (1928-1998), who practiced in Hannover, Germany. Many celebrities and executives from America went to Germany to be treated by Dr. Nieper, including one President of the United States.
Liquid ionic cesium chloride works by making cancer cells highly alkaline, typically 8.0 and above, thus making them so “sick” the immune system may attack and kill them.
Cesium chloride not only kills cancer cells indirectly, it immediately stops the metastasis of the cancer; can start shrinking tumour masses within weeks; and almost always stops the pain of cancer within 24 to 48 hours, depending on what is causing the pain.
Technically, the cesium chloride does not directly kill the cancer cells. What is does is allow the immune system to kill the cancer cells. When you see a statement that cesium chloride does not kill cancer cells, that is at least partially correct.
However, it is also probable that cesium chloride reverts cancer cells into normal cells. This can happen if the cesium chloride kills the microbes inside the cancer cells (by its high alkalinity) and the cancer cells are thus able to revert into normal cells. This is actually the ideal way to cure cancer because there is far less debris for the body to get rid of.
See the “What Causes Cancer” article, linked to on the left side-bar, to understand the theory behind the above statements.
Exactly what percentage of the cancer cells are killed by the immune system or what percentage are reverted into normal cells is unknown. The point to make is that the protocol is very effective.
“Many tests on humans have been carried out by [the late] H. Nieper in Hannover, Germany … as well as by a number of other physicians. On the whole, the results have been very satisfactory. It has been observed that all pains associated with cancer disappear within 12 to 24 hr, except in a very few cases where there was a morphine withdrawal problem that required a few more hours.
http://www.cancer-coverup.com/brewer/printbrewerreport.htm

[TonyGosling]

Diet and Cancer
http://www.pcrm.org/health/cancer-resources/diet-cancer

What we eat and how we treat our bodies on a daily basis have a very powerful effect on our health and quality of life. Although cancer can affect many different parts of the body, the foods that prevent cancer and deter cancer growth are generally the same. Fruits, vegetables, grains, and legumes all have important nutrients and other cancer-fighting substances like phytochemicals and pectin that strengthen immune function and destroy cancer-causing substances before they cause harm.

diet-and-cancer

Research has shown that people who eat a diet free of animal products, high in plant foods, and low in fat have a much lower risk of developing cancer. Search for research and fact sheets on topics listed below.

Cancer Facts:
Factors Contributing to Cancer
Foods for Cancer Prevention
Meat Consumption and Cancer Risk
Research of the Major Killers of Americans
The Roles of Exercise and Stress Management
Research by Cancer Type:
Breast Cancer
Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer
Testicular Cancer
Lung Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer
Colon Cancer
Esophageal and Gastric Cancer
Lymphoma
Women and Cancer: Opportunities for Prevention
Research on Diet and Cancer:
Milk and Dairy Consumption
Alcohol Consumption Increases Cancer Risk
Fish Oil Does Not Prevent Cancer
Whole Diet Counts
What Is It about Those Vegetarians?
Low-Fat Diet Boosts Immunity
The Power of Plants
Tomatoes Attack Cancer Cells
Cancer Risk from Animal Organs
What Causes Cancer?
DES Dangers May Extend to Grandchildren
Cancer Risk from Dioxin in Meat, Fish, and Dairy
Toxic Fish Compound Ends Up in Breast Milk
Milk Consumption and Prostate Cancer
Facts on Healthy Weight Control:
Low-Fat Study Underscores Need for Dramatic Dietary Changes
Overweight Tied to Certain Cancers
Body Mass Index and Breast Cancer Survival
Pancreatic Cancer Linked to Obesity
Holiday Weight Gain Stays Year-Round
Lose Weight with Old-Fashion Oatmeal
Nutrition Facts:
The Antioxidant Defenses
Foods and Immunity
Iron: The Double-Edged Sword
Fat and Hormonal Effects
Heterocyclic Amines
Other Dietary Factors
Setting Blame Aside
Carotenoids
Vitamin E
Vitamin C
Selenium
Fiber
Lycopene
Soy Isoflavones
Isothioscyanates
Other Phytochemicals

[Thomas Tol]

In 1920, mistletoe extracts were introduced for the first time as a cancer treatment by Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925).

http://www.eastlothiancourier.com/news/14744823.Port_Seton_man_beats_t erminal_cancer____after_injecting_mistletoe/


http://hub.jhu.edu/magazine/2014/spring/mistletoe-therapy-cancer/