A diesel car is better than petrol - find out why

[TonyGosling]

A lucky escape for the first guy admiring his mate's new motorcycle - but the truly insane speeding driver of the four-by-four is not so lucky - do share around but not to youngsters please.

Link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXuU_IzA-o0

[fish5133]

looks fake

[TonyGosling]

apparently it was on the Spanish TV news in August as genune
don't you mean 'looks unlikely'
excatly where is it faked?

[Disco_Destroyer]

2 cars in collision are sped up imo
Video also cuts when camera person changes position but conversation stays fluid.
Why does camera person move position and focus on traffic?

[Potter Stewart]

I favour the no 4x4 theory.

The Motorbike is completely intact, it was apparently hit in the rear, and the tail lights are still there, as you can see as he runs away from the apparent burning vehicle.

The windows are blacked out completely (not tinted)on the two cars that crash, as it would be a much more complex job to animate the drivers/passengers/interior.

The car that is impacted goes off screen when the 4x4 comes down the road then enters the screen a different colour before being hit. This is the point of animation insert.

The lamp post/ telegraph pole that the 4x4 hits is completely undamaged. this I would say is impossible considering the inertia of the vehicle.

there are no visible skid marks on, or damage to, the road. No glass or parts came off the 4x4 all visible windows intact after a high speed roll. No parts came off the motorbike

There was no concern for the occupants of the other car involved in the RTA which was nearer to the star and camera man. They also never return to have that vehicle in the video. These would be the victims more deserving of help if real.

Flames and smoke appear animated but difficult to rule out digital compression.

I can't download the video for closer analysis

It looked fake from the start but has had me doubting my own instincts.

I think it is only because of the video compression quality/ digitization that it has any credence as this blurs the lines between animation and digitally recorded reality.

It may just be a very well choreographed illusion.

Can't find anymore info about it on the net. I would have thought it would make more of a buzz if real.

Digital animation technology and mediated reality are pretty advanced and accessible now.

I have heard it said that we are in the age of manipulation.

Then again if it was on the news then it must be true?!

[fish5133]

think its the speed and direction of the vehicle that burst into flames and the fact they 'capture' it. The acting looks a little staged managed. But could be wrong

[scienceplease 2]

[TonyGosling]

Certainly is an interesting one eh??
Possibly a deliberate time waster?

Lots of spurious stuff in comments here though

1. the edit doesn't mean a thing
2. windscreen doesn't get direct hit & may be smashed by the end as we can't see it.
3. other car was nowhere nearly so badly affected by impact.
etc. etc.

no, the question is where and when is it suposed to have happened?

If I had to decide I still come down on the side of real but remain open minded

[Potter Stewart]

Ok, as I said in my previous post that my instincts tell me it is a fake. Unfortunately that is not proof that you could use to communicate the point to someone else, or use in a court of law.

Also the video quality digitization/compression makes it difficult to see the CGI as that line is blurred by pixilation, a key part of the illusion, as to do this in high definition would be phenomenally more complex and time consuming.

We need to understand how the illusion was created in order to find the flaws/evidence of fakery.

The edit referred to by Disco is the key to this illusion.

Before the cut the star in the white t-shirt has hands on the bike so both he and the bike are real, an important shot to create the illusion of him really being there.

After the cut the bike has moved position. If you look at the pavement there is a line breaking the slabs where it goes from light to dark. The bike is closer to the dark bit of pavement post edit.

After the cut the star in the white t-shirt has been blue screened into the shot (A blue room with no angular edges is used to shoot footage of the actor to be inserted into any scene e.g. Superman). The bike is still real at this point. You can tell when you know, as he is not touching the bike but is gesturing as if he is about to. He also doesn’t know where to look exactly.

The cameraman pans to where the 4x4 comes from. The bike goes out of shot. The victim car (real) goes off screen momentarily (another edit point where the real bike is removed, you can see a slight jump) and comes on screen a different colour (a CGI car which actually looks different).
There is no need to create the cars as you can buy or download for free CGI models of cars but there will be a limit to the choice available hence why the original (real) victim car looks older and a different colour. There is also a slight glitch of continuity as the (real) car goes off screen and comes back on (CGI).

The crash takes place and the bike is CGI at this point. Keep watching the bike and it lands and comes to a halt too quickly, also it lands with the rear wheel towards the camera and in a split second changes position to the front wheel towards the camera, as the real bike is inserted back in for the moving to the wrecked 4x4 bike bypass shot.
At this point the star in the white t-shirt is still blue screened, and his over animated wobbly movement and movement of the camera help to disguise the fact that he has been super imposed on the film, but although it is quite well done it is again only disguised by the poor quality of the video but is still obvious when you know.

The star in the white t-shirt runs past the camera man away from the burning 4x4, the camera man runs away then turns around and the star in the white t-shirt as several meters behind him. This point is the most obvious blue screening. (watch the feet)

I worked it out when I realised that the star in the white t-shirt never passes behind anything in the scene. As if you know a bit about how these things are produced you know the process of layers used. First layer is of the actual filmed scene. The second layer has been mapped with an augmented reality tool for the perspective and plane of the surface. The CGI vehicles and physics involved would be done on a 3D modelling program. The fire, explosion and smoke could have been added at this point. The star after being blue screened is added as the third layer and the lighting effects are added on a after effects video mastering program.

The effects that make it more believable are the shaky movement of the camera and the tremor through the camera during the explosion as the belief is that it would be difficult to map the CGI on top of it. There are two ways that this can be done. One is to create the effect with a relatively static camera and make it seem as if it is waving about, or to map the camera movement and aqpply the mapping to the CGI accordingly.

These were quite high end digital effects tools up until a couple of years ago but are now found on many digital video effects programmes.
For the actor to move behind something would have meant creating another layer mask of an object in the scene and inserting another layer in the mix.

The 4x4 hitting the lamp post is a clever touch as the CGI interacts with an object in the scene not just the road.
I personally consider this one put to bed now.

It was interesting but more because of its anonymity, the fact that there was absolutely no information available on the net, other than the video itself. It may have been done as a student project to demonstrate the artist’s ability using multiple visual effects. There is something uncomfortably cynical about the way it is portrayed as a real event. Fatal car accident that wasn’t is a pseudo snuff film.

It certainly was an effective time waster.


Link

[fish5133]

Tanks Potter. I see the bit about the way the bike stops so soon after being hit

[scienceplease 2]

Indeed, the bike stopping quickly, the zero damage to bike and light pole AND the vehicle flipping 180 degrees - it was pointing straight at camera when the van hit the bike and away from the camera when it finally comes to rest (improbably, coming to stand upright again).

[Potter Stewart]

If you look at the still frame of the you tube screen before you press play you can detect a difference in the contrast of the person in the frame to the surrounding scene.

Although it was a bit of a time waster, it is also an interesting exercise in observation and detective work.

[scienceplease 2]

[Disco_Destroyer]

Haha and not even next gen gameplay footage


Link


Epic Games' Next Generation GDC 2011 Tech Demo

http://gamevideos.1up.com/video/id/33064


Link



Link



Link

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

More to the point:
The calorific value of diesel fuel is roughly 45.5 MJ/kg (megajoules per kilogram), slightly lower than petrol which is 45.8 MJ/kg. However, diesel fuel is denser than petrol and contains about 15% more energy by volume (roughly 36.9 MJ/litre compared to 33.7 MJ/litre).
http://www.acea.be/news/article/differences-between-diesel-and-petrol

[TonyGosling]

THURSDAY, 1 MARCH 2018
Petrol the polluter
http://jonsthings.blogspot.co.uk/2018/03/petrol-polluter.html?m=1

Petrol engines release 25% more CO2 and NO1/2 (NOx) than diesel cars. So the way to release less NOx, is buy a diesel or better, an electric car.
To release 0 CO2 and NOx, buy a Tesla electric car. Totally emission free motoring.

NOx was out of the air, during natural rain – as nitrous and nitric acids. For this reason NOx has been at a static 4 parts per billion for all of history. A static trace gas – affects nothing.

As CO2 and NOx are released we get more natural plant growth on the land and seas. The life on Earth increases – these trace gases are capped by nature. Man could not affect their level if they tried.

If we use the electronics from a fluorescent light, we can fire up a 25x1cm steam plasma at 4 atmospheres. Above 3, he plasma one established self-sustains.

We get emission free heat
1 H2O+PL->E2+L+X-ray 600kW from our 25x1cm steam plasma.
Ford and BMW are looking at a thermoelectric generator, to replace a Fossil Fuels burning engine. We get off 288kW of power – 2 kW we take off to drive a fan to pass air over the plasma tube, and through the generator,

A Fossil Fuels burning, supercharged engine only produces 14kW. We need 45kW to fly a small helicopter.

So we fly at super sonic speed, between cities. Of 4x10-14cc of regular water a year: we will struggle to measure the water use in the life of the car. We use a spring, to maintain the plasma pressure.

When stationary, we plug into the mains, to sell our power. The national grid will pay use 600,000 UK pounds a year, for our excess, carbon free power. With no NOx – so plants will not get fertilized.

We do not buy any petrol OR diesel. And everybody drives a clean, 0 emission electric car. With a performance greater than a sports car today.

[TonyGosling]

...and better than electric?

The Final Wakeup Call - English
http://finalwakeupcall.info/en/2019/05/08/electric-vehicles-ecological ly-worse-than-diesel-motors/

Buy "The Great Awakening" Part 1 - Kindle Edition: HERE
Buy "The Great Awakening" Part 1 - Hard Copy: HERE

Electric Vehicles Ecologically Worse than Diesel Motors
The real Motivation is Government-control of Everyone
The Electric Shock
Diesel engines emit 20% less CO2
Conclusion; EV’s are politicised, not Green
Electric Vehicles: Government Subsidised Disaster

EV are a giant con operation and the biggest scam of our lifetime

A study directed by Christopher Buchal of the University of Cologne, recently published by Cesifo Institute in Munich, concludes that electric vehicles (EV) have “significantly higher CO2 emissions than diesel cars.” That is due to the large amount of energy used in the mining and processing of lithium, cobalt, and manganese, which are critical raw materials for the production of electric car batteries.



So, electric vehicles will not help cut CO2 emissions over the coming years, as the introduction of electric vehicles does not, in fact, lead to a reduction in CO2 -emissions from road traffic. Natural gas combustion engines are the ideal technology to exploit for the transition to vehicles which in the future, may be powered by hydrogen, “green” methane, or perhaps even alternative forms of suppressed, wireless free energy technology.



A battery pack for the Tesla Model 3, pollutes the climate with 11 to 15 tonnes of CO2. Each battery pack has a lifespan of approximately ten years, or total mileage of 94,000. That works out to emit 73 to 98 grams of CO2 per kilometre, or 116 to 156 grams of CO2 per mile, Buchal said. Add to this the CO2 emissions of the electricity from power plants that power such vehicles and the actual Tesla emissions could be between 156 to 180 grams of CO2 per kilometre, or 249 and 289 grams of CO2 per mile.



A battery pack costs the EV-owner over € 10.000, excluding the expenses for the recycling of the old pack. The pollution caused by these batteries is overwhelming. Think about how you are not even permitted to put tiny Li batteries in the garbage because of the extremely high toxicity. Where will all the defunct batteries go, added to the fact that they only last 10 years. Subsequently, one has to fork out $12,000 to buy a replacement, and how much does it cost you to dispose of the battery? EV is a giant con operation, just another Ponzi scheme for more debt-creation. As the banks decided to issue debt to fund this whole scheme!



In their study, the authors criticise the fact that EU legislation allows electric vehicles to be included in calculations for fleet emissions with a value of “zero” CO2 emissions. This suggests that electric vehicles do not generate any such emissions. The reality is that, in addition to the CO2 emissions generated in the production of electric vehicles, almost all EU countries generate significant CO2 emissions from charging the vehicles’ batteries using their national energy production mixes.



The authors also made a critical analysis of the discussion about electric cars in Germany, which centres around battery-operated vehicles, while other technologies also offer great potential: hydrogen-powered electric vehicles or vehicles with combustion engines powered by green methane, for instance. “Methane technology is ideal for the transition from natural gas vehicles with conventional engines to engines that will one day run on methane from CO2-free energy sources. This being the case, the German federal government should treat all technologies equally and promote hydrogen and methane solutions as well,” emphasises Professor Sinn.



For true emission reductions, researchers concluded the study by saying that methane-powered gasoline engines or hydrogen motors could cut CO2 emissions by a third and possibly eliminate the need for diesel motors altogether.



Global warming has been the biggest scam ever. Particularly when taking into account all the money that has been wasted on research at universities; wasted on corporate “green” incentives. Useless windmills that cost more to take down after they prematurely wear out, than it costs to put up in the first place, etc. What an utter shame with the paltry power supplied, the noise pollution and wasted landscapes.



Nowadays there is more Arctic/Antarctic ice than ever, more polar bears than ever, no ocean-level rise whatsoever. Nothing predicted 20-25 years ago has come true. Nothing. Conclusion; the plan to save the world with electric cars is the biggest scam of our lifetime. The scam is intricately entwined with the Greater Agenda 2030 of the elites to slowly rob us of our freedoms, including the freedom to move around as we choose. Electric cars are only the beginning of their sinister plan. What will surely follow in the future will be freshly obtained “scientific data,” proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that we must give up our rights to vehicles completely, in order to save the planet.



The real Motivation is the goal of Government to control Everyone

The sinister catch to this scam is that Self-driving, electrically-powered cars must always be connected to a network. Tesla’s EVs connect to a network over the 4G Grid today, which will become 5G wireless networks later this year. And remember: 5G is a microwave radiation technology being deployed as depopulation warfare, full spectrum dominance and absolute human control.



The government will know the location of every self-driving car at all times. And with the right authority, a self-driving car could be rerouted to a government’s location of choice at any time. For example, what if someone suspected of a crime was trying to “drive” out of state? The local government could simply reroute the car to the nearest police station.



And there’s something else very sinister behind all this: Consider Waymo, a self-driving technology development company, that belongs to Google’s parent company. Google’s motivation is simple: It wants to collect as much data as possible about consumers and sell that data to whomever will pay for it.



Google is spending much time and money on research and development on autonomous driving technology, so that it can license that technology to car manufacturers. In exchange, it will be able to retain and sell the data that it collects. Think about it before getting into an EV, it comes straight out the Orwellian caboose.



The Electric Shock

The laws of thermodynamics say: Energy cannot be created or destroyed; it simply changes form. The electricity used to power a car has to come from somewhere, at present, in the majority of cases, it still comes from coal-fired power plants.



Every time energy changes its form, as in the case of battery power, energy is lost due to inefficiencies of the system by friction, heat loss, drag, etc. Simply put, not all of the available energy stored in a battery, will be available for its intended purpose; Some, if not most, is lost to these inefficiencies.



The real, -non-political- solution for greener cars is readily available: For transportation only high quantities of energy accumulated per unit, end up being economically and practically acceptable for use in vehicles.



As laid out above, energy from electricity does not meet these conditions. Wind-power, solar etc. are not practical. Ethanol has a lower energy output per unit and requires a special, more expensive adaption to engines. The only energy source that meets the above criteria, is the internal combustion diesel engine that gets about 30% more mileage out of every litre than gasoline, and those savings are prevalent in all the different kinds of driving conditions, with a refuel range of over 1’000KM or 600 miles. What’s more, people who worry about global warming, prefer diesel, because it emits up to 20% less carbon dioxide (CO2) than other kinds of fuel.



Diesel engines emit 20% less CO2

This has been common knowledge to insiders for a long time. Diesel engines are not harmful to the environment! They don’t shorten the lifespan of people; it even extends the lifespan of citizens living in so-called seriously affected cities. Electric cars are more harmful. Just another grandiose lie that will meet the truth.



The tale of Media Fear-Mongering: The global warming story is a cautionary tale of how media-concocted fears have become the defining ideas of an entire generation. The whole global warming saga has become a religion and people who disagree are called lunatics.



It is said that Global warming could come from a gas called nitrous oxide (N2O):

Additionally, the International Council for Science (ICSU) in Paris, a federation of scientific associations from around the world, has issued a report concluding that most analyses made, have underestimated the substantial effects to global warming of a gas called nitrous oxide (N2O) by a factor of between three and five.



Although N2O is not common in the Earth’s atmosphere, it is a more potent greenhouse gas than CO2 and it hangs around much longer. But now it appears that this conclusion may be premature. For a rather long time, people living in the two cities on the planet with the highest NO2 concentration, namely Stuttgart and München live longer. Research has shown that in Stuttgart, the NO2 leader in 2018, residents can look forward to almost one and a half year longer lifespan than other people in Germany. The people living in Munich, blessed with the top NO2 value in 2017, even live a good two years longer than the German average.



There is apparently a clear link between NO2 exposure and public health and research has shown that the more and the denser the car traffic, the longer people seem to live. In short: nitrogen oxides are extending lives.



Whether the EU will introduce a long-overdue diesel duty, or at least a nitric oxide quota in the near future, based on these ground-breaking findings, cannot be predicted. However, we have a pretty good idea of how eco-activists will react if the NO2 limits are finally revealed as being purely fictional numbers.



Conclusion; EV’s are politicised and not Green

Electric cars are too expensive and bad, if not far worse for the environment than is purported by mainstream science. The electric green car is being politicised, presented and pushed as being a viable alternative to our present forms of transport. But it is also being politicised by idealists who do not know anything about the technical background on this subject. They are running with un-researched talking points and do not understand the faulty science.



Electricity is more often than not generated from coal, which qua CO2 emission is as bad or even worse than the CO2 gasses released by gasoline or diesel engines. Additionally, the manufacturing of batteries and the disposal of these batteries, that have an average lifetime of 10 years, are bad for the environment too. Not to mention the extra weight that has to be tossed around. While the average driving range on a fully loaded battery is approx., 300 KM or about 200 miles, and fast charge-infrastructure to provide a 60-70% top-up which takes more time than it takes to fill-up a tank with petrol, will require a new roll out of a network for fast electric vehicle filling stations. This must be rolled out on a grand scale, with the range between each station of 150 KM or 100miles. Frequent refilling is inconvenient on a long journey, when one must stop approximately every 1,5 hours for a refill.



Don’t believe that oil companies will closing their retail fill-up stations just to convert to an electric grid repository? Another obstacle has an even more difficult problem that no one wants to admit. Just how will the added demand for electricity be generated? If we must believe the pie in the sky environmentalists, they think that plugging into the grid is like charging their smartphone. Be assured; Electric cars aren’t going to take over.



Electric Vehicles a Government Subsidised Disaster

The use of electric battery propulsion, will not be the namesakes for EV personal transport. Government subsidies may be the Achilles heel of the car industry, but reliance on mobile electric fuel and battery storage, ignores the perspective that the petroleum oligarchy will just sit on their reserves and watch the long lines of extension cords plug into these high tech, costly, trendy go-carts.



On a personal note

FWC-articles are now being read in ten different languages around the world. Dedicated, expert translators participate in the translations. To better disperse the word, our articles are also presented in Russian and Spanish on video.

Now that language barriers greatly have been removed, anyone can easily find out how their government and banksters are playing a dangerous game against and with us.



In the interest of all of us; begin sharing FWC-articles with everyone you know. The more awake people the better it is for all of us, the sooner the cabal mafia will be permanently removed. Help with spreading the word!