View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 1009
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
flamesong wrote: | THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Patrick Brown wrote: | Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? |
Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please |
Hello Moderators - can I be the first to say that this hardly constitutes abusive language. Especially when measured against the language employed by certain no planers! |
Ok moderators - how about a sin bin whereby abusive posters are locked out for a week |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | flamesong wrote: | THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Patrick Brown wrote: | Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? |
Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please |
Hello Moderators - can I be the first to say that this hardly constitutes abusive language. Especially when measured against the language employed by certain no planers! |
Ok moderators - how about a sin bin whereby abusive posters are locked out for a week |
I must protest at such a move, blackcat would never get a look in poor love. _________________ I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | flamesong wrote: | THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Patrick Brown wrote: | Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? |
Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please |
Hello Moderators - can I be the first to say that this hardly constitutes abusive language. Especially when measured against the language employed by certain no planers! |
Ok moderators - how about a sin bin whereby abusive posters are locked out for a week |
How about a loony-bin where people are locked up for their own safety?
Have you seen my foot? _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Patrick Brown wrote:
Quote: | Have you seen my foot? |
Is this a thinly disguided joke about your genitals? _________________ I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
telecasterisation wrote: | Patrick Brown wrote:
Quote: | Have you seen my foot? |
Is this a thinly disguided joke about your genitals? |
Err no, the word was foot.
You seem to have a thing about genitalia tele!
Hey just for you:
_________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
Back to top |
|
|
utopiated Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Jun 2006 Posts: 645 Location: UK Midlands
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
John White Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 3187 Location: Here to help!
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
flamesong wrote: | THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Patrick Brown wrote: | Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? |
Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please |
Hello Moderators - can I be the first to say that this hardly constitutes abusive language. Especially when measured against the language employed by certain no planers! |
"No Brains" isn't much of an insult, its more of a tease. I'm sure Mr Brown could make a far more credible effort to insult if that was his intention
Although it is obviously possible to see the high speed of the Plane as evidence it wasnt there TWSU3 (becuase you do), perhaps it would be productive to explain why you dont consider it more likely to be the other alternatives: that is:
1) Being flown by remote control and therefore "safe" speed not an issue
or//
2) Being flown by a "nutta" on a death wish speed rush _________________ Free your Self and Free the World |
|
Back to top |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 1009
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
John White wrote: | flamesong wrote: | THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Patrick Brown wrote: | Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? |
Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please |
Hello Moderators - can I be the first to say that this hardly constitutes abusive language. Especially when measured against the language employed by certain no planers! |
"No Brains" isn't much of an insult, its more of a tease. I'm sure Mr Brown could make a far more credible effort to insult if that was his intention
Although it is obviously possible to see the high speed of the Plane as evidence it wasnt there TWSU3 (becuase you do), perhaps it would be productive to explain why you dont consider it more likely to be the other alternatives: that is:
1) Being flown by remote control and therefore "safe" speed not an issue
or//
2) Being flown by a "nutta" on a death wish speed rush |
Because I have seen testimony from airline pilots saying that flying big boeings at 500 mph is extremely dangerous (at low altitudes) and also that planes flow by remote control have a very smooth flight path unlike the one at WTC2
We all know that hijackers never flew em
Last edited by THETRUTHWILLSETU3 on Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:37 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
flamesong Major Poster
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 1305 Location: okulo news
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Because I have seen testimony from airline pilots saying that flying big boeings at 500 mph is extremely dangerous and also that planes flow by remote control have a very smooth flight path unlike the one at WTC2 |
Probably not as dangerous as flying them into buildings, though, eh! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 1009
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
flamesong wrote: | THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Because I have seen testimony from airline pilots saying that flying big boeings at 500 mph is extremely dangerous and also that planes flow by remote control have a very smooth flight path unlike the one at WTC2 |
Probably not as dangerous as flying them into buildings, though, eh! |
waaay haaaaay ---- Flamesong has a sense of humour --whatever next? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
flamesong Major Poster
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 1305 Location: okulo news
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | waaay haaaaay ---- Flamesong has a sense of humour --whatever next? |
You noticed! Whatever next!?
Now, how about answering a few outstanding questions? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 1009
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
flamesong wrote: | THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | waaay haaaaay ---- Flamesong has a sense of humour --whatever next? |
You noticed! Whatever next!?
Now, how about answering a few outstanding questions? |
My answer to the unanswered question is YES. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bicnarok Moderate Poster
Joined: 03 Sep 2006 Posts: 334 Location: Cydonia
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Patrick Brown"] THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Patrick Brown wrote: | Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? |
Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please |
Abusive language? thats not abusive language, something like this is ..you total and utter moronic pricking offspring of a rancid camel.
you mardy arsed git. _________________ "Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our mind..." Bod Marley |
|
Back to top |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 1009
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Bicnarok"] Patrick Brown wrote: | THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Patrick Brown wrote: | Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? |
Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please |
Abusive language? thats not abusive language, something like this is ..you total and utter moronic pricking offspring of a rancid camel.
you mardy arsed git. |
In that case F UCK U YOU PIECE OF SH ITE |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fallious Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 762
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
... And thats why no planes flew into the twin towers. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bicnarok Moderate Poster
Joined: 03 Sep 2006 Posts: 334 Location: Cydonia
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="THETRUTHWILLSETU3"] Bicnarok wrote: | Patrick Brown wrote: | THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Patrick Brown wrote: | Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? |
Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please |
Abusive language? thats not abusive language, something like this is ..you total and utter moronic pricking offspring of a rancid camel.
you mardy arsed git. |
In that case F UCK U YOU PIECE OF SH ITE |
Yeh someones got it, well done _________________ "Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our mind..." Bod Marley |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Bicnarok wrote: | Patrick Brown wrote: | THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Patrick Brown wrote: | Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? |
Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please |
Abusive language? thats not abusive language, something like this is ..you total and utter moronic pricking offspring of a rancid camel.
you mardy arsed git. |
In that case F UCK U YOU PIECE OF SH ITE |
Yeh someones got it, well done |
Err the quote above "you total and utter moronic pricking offspring of a rancid camel" is not mine. Was this an error or an atempt? _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Briaman Minor Poster
Joined: 27 Jul 2006 Posts: 39
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:18 pm Post subject: Flamesong and TTWSU3 |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: |
flamesong wrote: |
Now, how about answering [my question]?
|
My answer ... is YES.
|
Wow! Congratulations Flamesong and TTWSU3! I knew there was something about you two from the start.
When's the happy day?
I do hope I haven't gotten the wrong idea. _________________ Error in module creativity.dll : unable to create witty comment.
Abort / Retry / Ignore |
|
Back to top |
|
|
flamesong Major Poster
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 1305 Location: okulo news
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:32 pm Post subject: Re: Flamesong and TTWSU3 |
|
|
Briaman wrote: | THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: |
flamesong wrote: | Now, how about answering [my question]?
|
My answer ... is YES.
|
Wow! Congratulations Flamesong and TTWSU3! I knew there was something about you two from the start.
When's the happy day?
I do hope I haven't gotten the wrong idea. |
It might have been funny if you had't had to make up your own quotes. Sounds like you might get the wrong idea quite easliy.
As it happens, THETRUTHWILLSETU3 does not do answering questions. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 1009
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Please wind this on to 2 minutes 56 to see the impact
The on the scene reporter sees no plane only an explosion
The studio anchor says he saw a plane ---but why no emotion in his voice?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMucVeew8eg
MORE EXAMPLES TO FOLLOW |
|
Back to top |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 1009
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
So you say there were hundreds of witnesses who say the planes
If that is the case why are they talking to witnesses who did not see them?
Wind this clip to 4 mins 30 and listed to Lindsay Grimm
She was in a building nearby for the first impact and outside for the second --- she did not see either impact --- if there were hundreds of witnesses why were they talking to her?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoJwq86jw2k&mode=related&search=
MORE TO FOLLOW |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Please wind this on to 2 minutes 56 to see the impact
The on the scene reporter sees no plane only an explosion
The studio anchor says he saw a plane ---but why no emotion in his voice?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMucVeew8eg
MORE EXAMPLES TO FOLLOW |
This is a strange question Mr T. People approach life from different angles and I would hazard that part of a newscaster's brief is to impart a lack of emotion so as to not create panic. To even cite this as evidence of anything is misleading.
However, over in the Critic's Area, I have posted an image of my limited edition Chuckle Brothers gravy boat that I purchased from Ebay and I admit to crying when it arrived. _________________ I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 1009
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
wind this on to 7 minutes 15
The eye witness said
"we heard a big bang, then we saw smoke coming out, then we saw a plane coming out the other side of the building"
"then i heard another plane had hit"
FUNNY HOW WITH SO CALLED HUNDREDS OF WITESSES IT IS BASED ON WHAT THEY HEARD NOT WHAT THEY SAW
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5bVVc8bhac&mode=related&search= |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 1009
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: |
FUNNY HOW WITH SO CALLED HUNDREDS OF WITESSES IT IS BASED ON WHAT THEY HEARD NOT WHAT THEY SAW |
No, really it isn't. People on busy city streets do not walk around staring upwards, until something attracts their attention. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
4U2P you really are a shill even if you don't know it! Just remember that No Planes = No Brains. So we conclude that you're thick or a shill. Which one is it? _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
No, he says 'It wasn't a stealth, it just came in dead quiet'.
Try to quote correctly at least. _________________ I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC
Last edited by telecasterisation on Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:54 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Witnesses hear say they saw a Stealth plane that had switched it's engines off ----maybe it was a Hologram |
The phrase 'grasping at straws' springs to mind.
Anybody who has witnessed a fast fly-by at an airshow will readily testify that there is no noise until the aircraft is almost upon you.
But I am interested in what you think your continual espousing of NPT theory achieves, because all the evidence you seem to base it on looks at best faulty, and at worst deliberately misleading.
Does it make you feel cleverer than the rest of us?
More aware of the NWO's secret technology?
Or perhaps some chance of ingratiating your way into Rosie Grable's pants?
You must have some reason, so what is it?
Moreover what difference does the 'how' make to 911 being an inside job?
Obviously, you believe I'm the shill here, but hey! - aren't shills allowed to ask questions too?
Not that I expect any answers.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 1009
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
chek wrote: | THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Witnesses hear say they saw a Stealth plane that had switched it's engines off ----maybe it was a Hologram |
The phrase 'grasping at straws' springs to mind.
Anybody who has witnessed a fast fly-by at an airshow will readily testify that there is no noise until the aircraft is almost upon you.
But I am interested in what you think your continual espousing of NPT theory achieves, because all the evidence you seem to base it on looks at best faulty, and at worst deliberately misleading.
Does it make you feel cleverer than the rest of us?
More aware of the NWO's secret technology?
Or perhaps some chance of ingratiating your way into Rosie Grable's pants?
You must have some reason, so what is it?
Moreover what difference does the 'how' make to 911 being an inside job?
Obviously, you believe I'm the shill here, but hey! - aren't shills allowed to ask questions too?
Not that I expect any answers.... |
The how is important for umpteen reasons - if you don't know what they are then you are not as bright as I thought you were.
I'm not grasping at any straws Chek - how many coincidences do you need? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|