View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
prole art threat Validated Poster
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 804 Location: London Town
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 10:27 am Post subject: "Dont let anybody intimidate you into silence." |
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMYzwf01Z7I _________________ 'Maybe if I can show some lurking kids that this is all a pack of lies, then maybe I can make a difference. I don't plan on converting any of you because you're all mad.'
-Johnny Pixels |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IronSnot Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 595 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ally wrote: | nobody cares, buzz off doil. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
IronSnot Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 595 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
prole art threat wrote: | Poiuytr, is 'rodin' another colleague of yours or is he/she a Commanderson alter-ego? Just wondering. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
IronSnot Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 595 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 11:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
prole art threat wrote: | Go away, you, like your shill buddies, have failed the test. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
IronSnot Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 595 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
prole art threat wrote: | Also, what have my relatives got to do with anything, you baffling little jerkoid? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
IronSnot Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 595 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
prole art threat wrote: | Go and form your own website ffs and stop contaminating this website with your plutonium rants. This is a website about 9/11 NOT plutonium poisoning. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kc Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 359
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
You know if you search this forum for the word SHILL you get over 6 pages of results? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fallious Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 762
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kc wrote: | You know if you search this forum for the word SHILL you get over 6 pages of results? |
Thats by topic, if you list them by post you get 23 pages.
Without actualy counting them, I think the biggest shouter recently is definately prole (goes with the NPT turf), then Ally and Patrick Brown is obviously up there in third, I think. _________________ "Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kc Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 359
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd say Paddys definately the Shill meister. Ally and Prole are rarely humane or polite enough to hold themselves back with shill ;) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006 Posts: 1628
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 10:35 pm Post subject: Re: "Dont let anybody intimidate you into silence." |
|
|
prole art threat wrote: | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMYzwf01Z7I |
So he claims that the US government ignored warnings from a variety of sources of imminent attack, and indeed hindered the proper interception of the planes, thus allowing 19 Arabs to successfully crash three planes into buildings in NY and Washington.
You have recently devoted a lot of effort into claiming that no planes crashed into the buildings, and the buildings were felled by controlled demolition.
Why are you posting this clip? _________________ ".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 9:38 am Post subject: Re: "Dont let anybody intimidate you into silence." |
|
|
Bushwacker wrote: | prole art threat wrote: | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMYzwf01Z7I |
So he claims that the US government ignored warnings from a variety of sources of imminent attack, and indeed hindered the proper interception of the planes, thus allowing 19 Arabs to successfully crash three planes into buildings in NY and Washington.
You have recently devoted a lot of effort into claiming that no planes crashed into the buildings, and the buildings were felled by controlled demolition.
Why are you posting this clip? |
just because people have theorys dosnt make anything this man in the clip says make them untrue, he says he knows what it takes to intercept and knows what was changed in order not to. he dosnt touch on any other subjects apart from foreknowledge, and deliberate orders to make the u.s airforce unresponsive to the attacks. he dosnt mention the planes going into buildings or other oddity's so how can you say that by what he says CD could not also of happened. i think by watching that clip it shows just how much there is to go on, he dosnt mention anything to do with each plane or building yet still makes it obvious we were lied to. its just a pitty other people have to try and make something out of it he didnt say.
just because he didnt mention 19 arabs or CD dosnt mean he dosnt think there are odditys there, hes just sticking to what he knows as an ex-airfighter pilot who use to intercept suspious craft when called upon. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006 Posts: 1628
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:02 am Post subject: Re: "Dont let anybody intimidate you into silence." |
|
|
marky 54 wrote: | Bushwacker wrote: | prole art threat wrote: | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMYzwf01Z7I |
So he claims that the US government ignored warnings from a variety of sources of imminent attack, and indeed hindered the proper interception of the planes, thus allowing 19 Arabs to successfully crash three planes into buildings in NY and Washington.
You have recently devoted a lot of effort into claiming that no planes crashed into the buildings, and the buildings were felled by controlled demolition.
Why are you posting this clip? |
just because people have theorys dosnt make anything this man in the clip says make them untrue, he says he knows what it takes to intercept and knows what was changed in order not to. he dosnt touch on any other subjects apart from foreknowledge, and deliberate orders to make the u.s airforce unresponsive to the attacks. he dosnt mention the planes going into buildings or other oddity's so how can you say that by what he says CD could not also of happened. i think by watching that clip it shows just how much there is to go on, he dosnt mention anything to do with each plane or building yet still makes it obvious we were lied to. its just a pitty other people have to try and make something out of it he didnt say.
just because he didnt mention 19 arabs or CD dosnt mean he dosnt think there are odditys there, hes just sticking to what he knows as an ex-airfighter pilot who use to intercept suspious craft when called upon. |
How can there have been numerous warnings from other governments of planned attacks, if there were no such attacks planned and they were faked by the Bush administration?
If there were no planes, as prole fart claims, there would be no need to "stand-down" NORAD.
This clip supports LIHOP theories, prole fart supports a very particular version of MIHOP. _________________ ".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 5:00 pm Post subject: Re: "Dont let anybody intimidate you into silence." |
|
|
Bushwacker wrote: | marky 54 wrote: | Bushwacker wrote: | prole art threat wrote: | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMYzwf01Z7I |
So he claims that the US government ignored warnings from a variety of sources of imminent attack, and indeed hindered the proper interception of the planes, thus allowing 19 Arabs to successfully crash three planes into buildings in NY and Washington.
You have recently devoted a lot of effort into claiming that no planes crashed into the buildings, and the buildings were felled by controlled demolition.
Why are you posting this clip? |
just because people have theorys dosnt make anything this man in the clip says make them untrue, he says he knows what it takes to intercept and knows what was changed in order not to. he dosnt touch on any other subjects apart from foreknowledge, and deliberate orders to make the u.s airforce unresponsive to the attacks. he dosnt mention the planes going into buildings or other oddity's so how can you say that by what he says CD could not also of happened. i think by watching that clip it shows just how much there is to go on, he dosnt mention anything to do with each plane or building yet still makes it obvious we were lied to. its just a pitty other people have to try and make something out of it he didnt say.
just because he didnt mention 19 arabs or CD dosnt mean he dosnt think there are odditys there, hes just sticking to what he knows as an ex-airfighter pilot who use to intercept suspious craft when called upon. |
How can there have been numerous warnings from other governments of planned attacks, if there were no such attacks planned and they were faked by the Bush administration?
If there were no planes, as prole fart claims, there would be no need to "stand-down" NORAD.
This clip supports LIHOP theories, prole fart supports a very particular version of MIHOP. |
first of all its no good asking me about NPT as i dont believe it either, so my answer would be there were planes. and your first question makes a lot of sense to ask and is a good question, however im not going to pretend i know all the answers to that. mainly because there are numerous possibilities. the guy in clips is right though from what i know or understand there have been reports america was offered numerous warnings before the attacks. maybe someone else can answer how the other countrys would of know if like you say it was'nt planned to happen by outsiders. sorry i car'nt help but would rather be honest than just saying anything when im not 100%. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006 Posts: 1628
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good for you, marky! If only more folk had the same attitude....... _________________ ".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dogsmilk Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006 Posts: 1616
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | How can there have been numerous warnings from other governments of planned attacks, if there were no such attacks planned and they were faked by the Bush administration?
If there were no planes, as prole fart claims, there would be no need to "stand-down" NORAD.
This clip supports LIHOP theories, prole fart supports a very particular version of MIHOP.
|
From any perspective, the attacks were planned and initiated - the question is how and by whom. From a general MIHOP perspective, there are suggestions considering what flavour of MIHOP tickles your palette - e.g. if the hijackers were 'patsies' with the 'conspiritors' pulling their strings, you would still expect intelligence services to pick up 'chatter'. Particularly if you subsribe to the belief that 'intelligence agencies' and 'terrorist groups' are often interchangeable. LIHOP and MIHOP can be very similar if you suggest the attacks were 'pushed' rather than simply 'allowed'.
From an NPT angle, it is an intriguing question, one I think has to be accounted for for NPT to 'work'.
Quote: | Good for you, marky! If only more folk had the same attitude....... |
I second that. It's likely very few people on the planet can be fully confident they know 'the full truth'. At any rate, you can't purport to 'seek the truth' without being honest about what you don't know. _________________ It's a man's life in MOSSAD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|