FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

b*, he has gone straight past.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Controversies
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
thought criminal
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 574
Location: London

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 4:36 pm    Post subject: b*, he has gone straight past. Reply with quote

"Heyyy, over here, you idiot! "


Link
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Micpsi
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 505

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess such footage proves that we cannot trust any video footage of 9/11 unless it confirms what we already believed or disbelieved....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marky 54
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293

PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

a plane flys by obviously to make it look like the plane hit the towers?

so where is the explosion as it flys away? it wasnt very convincing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Batrabill
Banned
Banned


Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 89

PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think this is just meant as a bit of a joke.

While I know black humour is all the rage....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thought criminal
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 574
Location: London

PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

marky 54 wrote:
a plane flys by obviously to make it look like the plane hit the towers?

so where is the explosion as it flys away? it wasnt very convincing.


It proves that credible looking CGI technology exists, I simply cannot be bothered to have circuitous arguments with an undesirable such as you.

I was only flying by, Agent Marky, just flying by...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
telecasterisation
Banned
Banned


Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs

PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thought criminal wrote:
marky 54 wrote:
a plane flys by obviously to make it look like the plane hit the towers?

so where is the explosion as it flys away? it wasnt very convincing.


It proves that credible looking CGI technology exists, I simply cannot be bothered to have circuitous arguments with an undesirable such as you.

I was only flying by, Agent Marky, just flying by...


There can be few individuals who doubt that realistic CGI is not only possible, but having seen Lord Of The Rings, it wasn't until three weeks later that I was told that trees don't really walk.

With this in mind - yes, there is a great deal of fake footage that surrounds 9/11, WTC scenario in particular. However, you would have us believe that this abounded ON the day itself, the TV networks were complicite and the newscasters were given scripts to mask the fact there were no planes involved. This is a completely different subject altogether than merely 'credible looking CGI technology exists'.

Until such time as you have something tangible that can be even remotely substantiated, perhaps you might like to join Mr Johnson and TTWSU3 who are currently on holiday together in Tenerife, although knock first before entering.

_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marky 54
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293

PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 9:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thought criminal wrote:
marky 54 wrote:
a plane flys by obviously to make it look like the plane hit the towers?

so where is the explosion as it flys away? it wasnt very convincing.


It proves that credible looking CGI technology exists, I simply cannot be bothered to have circuitous arguments with an undesirable such as you.

I was only flying by, Agent Marky, just flying by...


i do wonder what type of mind you must have not to see the film is fake.

the plane comes in and goes behind the tower, it then stops and is repeated the other side of the tower making it seem like a fly by, which fails because if it was someone forgot to trigger the explosion.

come on a dimwit could tell that, well then again..... Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thought criminal
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 574
Location: London

PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 9:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

marky 54 wrote:
thought criminal wrote:
marky 54 wrote:
a plane flys by obviously to make it look like the plane hit the towers?

so where is the explosion as it flys away? it wasnt very convincing.


It proves that credible looking CGI technology exists, I simply cannot be bothered to have circuitous arguments with an undesirable such as you.

I was only flying by, Agent Marky, just flying by...


i do wonder what type of mind you must have not to see the film is fake.

the plane comes in and goes behind the tower, it then stops and is repeated the other side of the tower making it seem like a fly by, which fails because if it was someone forgot to trigger the explosion.

come on a dimwit could tell that, well then again..... Rolling Eyes


I never said it wasn't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marky 54
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293

PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thought criminal wrote:
marky 54 wrote:
thought criminal wrote:
marky 54 wrote:
a plane flys by obviously to make it look like the plane hit the towers?

so where is the explosion as it flys away? it wasnt very convincing.


It proves that credible looking CGI technology exists, I simply cannot be bothered to have circuitous arguments with an undesirable such as you.

I was only flying by, Agent Marky, just flying by...


i do wonder what type of mind you must have not to see the film is fake.

the plane comes in and goes behind the tower, it then stops and is repeated the other side of the tower making it seem like a fly by, which fails because if it was someone forgot to trigger the explosion.

come on a dimwit could tell that, well then again..... Rolling Eyes


I never said it wasn't.


why post it? i'd say only a agent would pass that of as genuine to make people believe it is real to spoon feed them a theory to take them away from going down the right path, but you dont believe it is geniune, but i do wonder why you posted it if you knew that before hand Confused .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marky 54
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293

PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 9:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"here is a video proving cgi is convincing" = no confusion


"Heyyy, over here, you idiot! " = wtf is this about?


does anyone see a problem yet?

explainations often help people to understand what the purpose of the post is for, as CGI wasnt mentioned originally i am left wondering how the hell i was meant to know this other than thinking you were posting it as real footage.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thought criminal
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 574
Location: London

PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

marky 54 wrote:
"here is a video proving cgi is convincing" = no confusion


"Heyyy, over here, you idiot! " = wtf is this about?


does anyone see a problem yet?

explainations often help people to understand what the purpose of the post is for, as CGI wasnt mentioned originally i am left wondering how the hell i was meant to know this other than thinking you were posting it as real footage.


Whatever.

_________________
chek wrote:

look at NIST's and other photos in a decent resolution to see what damage was actually caused.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Johnny Pixels
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 932
Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker

PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 11:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thought criminal wrote:
marky 54 wrote:
"here is a video proving cgi is convincing" = no confusion


"Heyyy, over here, you idiot! " = wtf is this about?


does anyone see a problem yet?

explainations often help people to understand what the purpose of the post is for, as CGI wasnt mentioned originally i am left wondering how the hell i was meant to know this other than thinking you were posting it as real footage.


Whatever.


The best way to get a point across to people isn't to call them all idiots.

_________________

I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth. - Umberto Eco
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ian neal
Angel - now passed away
Angel - now passed away


Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 3140
Location: UK

PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

telecasterisation wrote:
.... perhaps you might like to join Mr Johnson and TTWSU3 who are currently on holiday together in Tenerife, although knock first before entering.


To clarify Andrew Johnson is still around and busy campaigning. TTWSU3 was banned from the forum not because of hwat he believes but because he failed to heed the constant warnings that to abuse and constantly accuse those that disagreed with him of being a shill was breaking the forum rules.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
scubadiver
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 1850
Location: Currently Andover

PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ian neal wrote:
TTWSU3 was banned from the forum not because of hwat he believes but because he failed to heed the constant warnings that to abuse and constantly accuse those that disagreed with him of being a shill was breaking the forum rules.


I wondered why I hadn't seen his name for awhile!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Controversies All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group