Jones Vs. Robertson

[Me]

http://www.journalof911studies.com/

Jones v. Robertson, A Physicist and a Structural Engineer Debate the Controlled demolition of the World Trade Center Gregg Roberts

[Fallious]

A personal highlight:

"ROBERTSON: And understand the damage that it would have to be. Look at the damage that the plane did to the north side of the North Tower. That's the most publicized view, I suppose. A huge number of collumns were taken out and the building remained standing.

JONES: About 15% actually, I've heard, in the NIST Report, its about 15%

ROBERTSON: Of the columns around the, around the-

JONES: That includes both.

ROBERTSON: But on the face of the-

JONES: Of the core and the perimiter columns, you just count 'em up, and divide by...

ROBERTSON: To be honest- a huge hole was put in the building, and it managed to stand there."

hohohoh.

[Me]

I have an MP3 of this somewhere. This interview was definitely pre-approved in favor of Robertson. I believe that is the only reason that he agreed to participate in this debate. When Jones attempted to work building seven in to the discussion Robertson quickly dodged and made an excuse to avoid it. The host went right along with his diversion without challenging him. Robertson also seemed to be allowed the most speaking time as well.