| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Witchfinder General
Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Posts: 134
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
 Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 11:32 am Post subject: Re: Was the WTC fireball not real just more CGI? |
 |
|
Witchfinder General
Why are you taking video of the 'day' as evidence of anything whatsoever?
There were countless people there who say they witnessed it - how is this explained away? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 1:53 pm Post subject: Re: Was the WTC fireball not real just more CGI? |
|
|
I can only guess in despair at the interpretation you and the gang over at "researchers" are putting on it WG.
The far more likely interpretation is that as it occurs during a zoom out sequence, the video codec - being optimised for speed and efficiency - has determined that the fireball doesn't change enough compared to the amount of new background information being introduced as the camera zooms out.
Does Killtown (or any of you) know how video codecs (compression -decompression programs) work?
Might be an area some of your more fluent readers will want to look into.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Watch the fireball from 01:47 - 01:38 and it expands and grows exactly as you'd expect, there is no 'freezing'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I believe what he's getting at is the 1.33-1.25 section (incidentally, why is the timecoding reversed??) where the fireball appears static relative to the moving background, although the pattern of debris below it certainly does change.
It's the relative to that leads me to think it's the codec at work.
Or are the Motion Picture Experts Group in on the whole thing as well?
The rabbit hole goes ever deeper...
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
