Ron Paul Tells 911 Truth "Absolutely Not An Inside Job&

[911Eyewitness]

So, here it is. You claim that Shayler said some things and I do not believe it.

Ron Paul does not believe government had absolutely ANYTHING to do with 911 other than incompetent Keystone Cops.

I have real proof, his words recorded to tell 911 Truth where to get off the ship. Do you have Dave’s?

http://www.911researchers.com/node/904

[outsider]

[paul wright]

[rodin]

Trust no leader. Egos plus conceit plus backing = MOTS

[GazeboflossUK]

Come on......Ron Paul knows there are major problems with the government's story on 9/11 - he has 100% supported a new, independent enquiry (which is something most of us want, right?) and he has gone on record about many other staged terror attacks in the past.

Ron Paul isn't in the same position as us if he states '9/11 was an inside job' then I'm sure all the media in America would kill his chances of speaking in any debates. Which is a bad thing.

I think the fact that he has been on the Alex Jones Radio show many, many times speaks volumes - since Jones is the biggest mouth on 9/11 being a military industrial complex, staged attack.

[Cruise4]

Plenty of wriggle room in that comment. Regardless of what Ron Paul says or does on 9/11 he still comes out 1000% better than anyone else currently involved. And 911Eyewitness actually just misrepresented the very video he referred to, which suggests desperation!

Ron Paul does not speak for the 9/11 truth movement.

[karlos]

[rodin]

I'd love to think RP really was a great white hope. And that holding back on 911 is simply pragmatism, that all would be reveled were he elected.

However he says 911 is definitely not an inside job. He coild have said nothing about it at all. How is he now going to turn around and tell the truth without being lampwned?

[levin]

I think it's important to remember that not only is Ron Paul an unbelievably supportable candidate, he is also proving to be an outstanding political strategist. The way he burst out of the blocks in the debates with "I am the CHAMPION of the constitution", the mileage he made out of the Giuliani fracas, the way the campaign is using the internet, the way he uses the relatively small finances he has, being just a few examples.

However, if Ron Paul is going to make any headway in his campaign he needs to be 100% so squeaky-clean-you-could-see-your-face-in-his-shiny-shoes in the eyes of the media spotlight. He needs something, that when these 9/11 questions come up, which they inevitably will the closer he gets and the more popular he becomes, to point to and say 'that's what I said I believe - you've got NOTHING on me'.

As an aside, I have only heard Ron Paul say he doesn't believe the government did it, not that it wasn't an inside job. Did the government own the WTC? No. Did elite private equity leaders and corporate-industrials? Yes.

Regardless, I completely agree with your appraisal of the situation, Stelios, and as far as anyone coming on here to undermine him and try to rock his boat goes, I'd like to throw you a lot further that I could trust you - provocateur.

[911Eyewitness]

[911Eyewitness]

[GazeboflossUK]

Haha, "911 Eyewitness" you joker. You called me what now?


Link

[karlos]

[911Eyewitness]

[GazeboflossUK]

[911Eyewitness]

[GazeboflossUK]

I don't know whether you are ignoring the evidence on purpose but I did embed a video further up this page.

Martell (Scholars For Truth): "So would you advocate for a new investigation into 9/11?"

Ron Paul:"Yes...I think we have to look at the details of it. The investigations were an investigation where there were governmant cover-ups..[] I would certainly consider that and think it would be worthwhile. I'll talk to Dennis (Kucinich) he is in a position now with a party majority...we'd have a better chance of getting a NEW INVESTIGATION"

Here's the link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d91a13Yr3oQ

[blackcat]

http://www.newshounds.us/2007/08/05/fox_news_interviews_rep_ron_paul_o n_iraq_iran_immigration_social_security_gun_control.php

I posted this in the "Ron Paul" thread but perhaps this is a more appropriate thread.

Interview with Fox News where he is asked about his 9/11 beliefs and why he "associates" with Alex Jones.

[levin]

Rick, you are a most blatant saboteur, which leads to only one of two conclusions:

a) You're doing it for undisclosed personal reasons.

b) You're in the employ of someone who has made it your role.

Given that if b) were true you would have been fired long ago for being the worst 'undercover' provocateur in history, that only leaves a), but in the end you alone know.

[Mark Gobell]

I too have been a tad confused by Mr Siegel's apparent attitude, not least because I'm not sure I may have it right.

I don't follow the blogs in any great detail so I'm not really aware of the intimate details of your journey from producing the 9/11 Eye Witness film to where you are now with 9/11 Truth and the campaign etc.

Would it be too much to ask for a short precis of your current position is Rik, so that I and presumably, many others can understand first hand wtf is going on ?

[David WJ Sherlock]

I have put a video on my "Myspace" of Ron Paul interviewed on Fox News. Here he says that he does not believe 9/11 is an inside job. I wonder if this is really is view? I will only leave it on my site for about seven days.

http://www.myspace.com/GlassAsylum

[karlos]

Ron Paul is the most sceptical about the official story.
Who would people rather get?
Hilary the warmonger
or Guiliani the 911 culprit?
So i suggest that Ron Paul is the only choice for world peace.

PS: Many elements of the 911 conspiracy were not insiders. Like Mossad for example.

But if any political leader by calling it an inside job he is pointing the finger at George Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld. 3 members of his same party from whom he is seeking support.
It would be political suicide and he would be forced to run as an independant again.

[David WJ Sherlock]

[festival of snickers]

when ron paul was a doctor he refused to take medicare or medicade for the poor and his followers think that "is such a virtue"

who in their right mind who is poor or working poor is gonna vote for ron paul?hes a liberatrian

whats worse than a libertarian ? a libertarian doctor i guess

i dont know -hes not for me i guess not

[karlos]

Evidence Suggests Ron Paul Was Cheated
Ron Paul's fifth place in the Iowa Straw Poll questioned due to voting machine failure, fuzzy figures and conflicts of interest

A host of curious events at the Iowa Straw Poll at the weekend has raised questions as to whether there was some kind of tampering with the final vote count, with evidence to suggest Ron Paul may have been wrongly placed in fifth position behind Mitt Romney and three second tier candidates.

It was reported by local TV news stations before the event that upwards of 45,000 Republicans would arrive to meet candidates and cast their votes, however this number was dwindled down to between 30,000 and 33,000 according to the Iowa GOP's projected figures.

The number of voters then decreased by another sizable margin to around 26,000 the next day, only for the final figure to drop EVEN FURTHER to 14,302 actual votes cast.

Even if the immediate figures of 45,000 and 33,000 were wrong and the Iowa GOP grossly overestimated the figures, with only 26,000 tickets being sold, this still does not account for the other 12, 000 tickets that suddenly disappeared. One has to ask the question why did 12,000 people buy tickets at $35 each and not vote?

[eogz]

Evidence Suggests Ron Paul Was Cheated

Funny....

Its not them to cheat at anything! I mean everyone knows the last two elections were so honest open and without tampering. Hey the US is the worlds leader of the supply of Democracy, whether you want it or not!

I reckon Ron Paul is the only decent candidate for the US Presidency (Libretarian or not), unfortunately that means he is least likely to win.